Federalist papers and question
Federalist papers assignment
Has it worked in practice? Due in part to the natural disinclination among people to admit their own mistakes or sacrifice their own interests, it was feared that factions would hinder the public policy-making process and hamstring the workings of government. Having a larger republic means that the representatives will be chosen from a larger number of people, thus increasing the likelihood that the elected representatives will be good, virtuous people. What is its function today? What do you make of the argument Chapters 47—48 that while separation of powers among the three main branches of government was a "sacred maxim of free government," yet such powers could not be "kept totally separate and distinct"? What does Hamilton mean when he says that an "independent spirit in the judges" is essential for them to do their duty? Explain why, or why not. Answers will vary, but in the end the students should conclude that "such devices [separation of powers] should be necessary to control the abuses of government" and "you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. In what fields is the president restricted from acting without the advice and consent of the Senate? In a direct democracy, citizens gather together in a public place and vote on public policy. The teacher now asks the students a critical analysis question for each of the Anti-Federalist Papers.
What are the arguments for and against having the states enjoy equal representation in the Senate — two senators two votes for each state, regardless of wealth, size, or population? They will need to select a debate moderator from within their group and divide the remaining students into Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
This led to a spirited exchange of short essays between the Federalists, who promoted the new Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists, who put forward a variety of objections to the proposed new government. How might the Federalist Papers have been different if Alexander Hamilton hadn't been able to convince James Madison to write Federalist essays?
Federalist 39 questions
Give examples pro and con. Divide the class into groups of three to five students. The students will demonstrate their understanding in both writing and speaking. Should the Senate have a determining voice Chapter 66 in approving or disapproving the appointment of those chosen by the president for high government offices, such as members of his cabinet, justices of the Supreme Court, and so on? Individual Assignment Find and describe five examples of "checks and balances" in the Constitution refer to your government textbook. The people should elect government leaders who act like angels. Hamilton soon recruited two others, James Madison and John Jay, to contribute essays to the series. Explain your answer in about words. The authors of the Federalist papers believed that the state governments would enjoy more support from the public than the federal government would.
The Federalist, also called The Federalist Papers, has served two very different purposes in American history. Be explicit in explaining your views. The executive branch, and the President specifically, was often derided by anti-federalists as an American king.
Militias were thought to inspire and nurture republican virtues of independence and liberty, whereas standing armies were thought to make citizens overly dependent on professional soldiers.
Read the Constitution, especially the preamble, noting the main aims the Constitution was designed to achieve. Standing armies stood in sharp contrast to militias, which were military forces made up of local volunteers who only served during times of war.
Are the Federalist papers persuasive and convincing? It also leads to a violation of the rights of minorities since there is nothing to check the power of the majority.
based on 23 review